
Revenge can be subtle and quiet in its attack. In fact, those who profess to love one another are often the most vindictive in employing the tactics of revenge.
You will judge me as an attacker and set a retributive cost for my psychological attack and I will always evaluate the cost as not equal to my actions and magnify my reciprocating attack based on that perceived inequality. Thus, the circle of reactivity is maintained.
Justification is always forthcoming and easily invented. Your ego is righteous in its need to attack, as I am in attacking you, and soon the foundation of our relationship becomes righteous justification for attack.
Oh sure, we have moments free of attack. But they are always stifled by our defensive preparations and anticipation of the words that commence the battle. We know the words that commence hostilities as we’ve said them time and time again, always accurately predicting the results.
The expressions of battle always begin with one chief word, more powerful than all others… ”you.”
Yet, when you say these words, is it the real “me” you see or merely your own conceptual rendition?
Revenge must make an object of your opponent and this is a basic premise of war. To attack the enemy without guilt, the enemy must remain faceless and can have no feelings for which to confuse your egoic goal of attack.
In the moment of justified anger, I must become an object for you. No longer loved, but as an enemy I am eligible for destruction. What you seek to destroy is my psychological self, but only so that you may experience increased control. If I can be controlled, you have won.
For some this becomes a daily occurrence. When your most significant relationships are stifled by attack-defend-attack scenarios, is it any wonder that your engagement with the world loses its luster and joy becomes desensitized numbness?
The external world is an interior experience that you create within yourself through your relationships with others. If your most significant relationships are oppressed by revenge, and attack-defend-attack scenarios, is it any wonder why the world seems so gray?
Contrary to pop psychology, happiness is not a solitary pursuit.
The solution is in your mind. Do not expect it from the other, until you identify your own mental concepts of who the ‘other’ really is in the moment of anger.
IF THIS, THEN THAT: Are You Planning to One Day "Awaken"?
-
Do you meditate religiously? Do you attend spiritual conventions and
retreats? Do you subscribe to “spiritual awakening” blogs and read all the
most popul...
1 day ago

2 comments:
Hi Mike,
I haven't been to this site in quite awhile. Actually, I avoided it, talking about relationships exclusively was something I'd avoid like the plague. Nothing personal. But very personal for me, as I spend almost all my time alone currently. I try to tell myself of the necessity, choice, circumstance, recovery etc..
One of those reasons includes this cycle of hostility you describe. I felt and probably still do feel that until I can get my 'anger' straight, who, what, where, when, why and how, appropriately expressed, I avoid interaction to a great extent. It is an extreme position but equal to an extreme situation I find myself in.
Yet, my desire has a completely different view, that I find I don't honor nearly enough.
Glad I stopped by, fear abated just enough to let it happen I guess. The article is a very clear description of EXACTLY what transpires in some if not all relationships one has in their mind.
Barbara
Hey Barbara,
Yes, relationship is probably the most fearful aspect of ego 'existence.'
I agree we all need to go our own pace, but it seems to me that once we break free of this egoic fear, relationship will be the means of our 'awakening.'
Thanks for stoppin' by!
mikeS
Post a Comment